Ricardo Easley v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: RICARDO EASLEY
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Case Number: 22-10046
Filed: January 6, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 3, 2022 USDC MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis as to Appellant Ricardo Easley was filed on 02/17/2022. Docket Entry 27. [Entered: 03/03/2022 11:21 AM]
February 23, 2022 MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Ricardo Easley. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9610820-1] [Entered: 03/03/2022 11:19 AM]
February 3, 2022 This APPELLANT has been notified that upon expiration of fourteen (14) days from this date, this appeal will be dismissed by the clerk without further notice unless the required filing fee has been received or a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is filed in the District Court. The appellant is being served with this letter. [Entered: 02/03/2022 12:46 PM]
January 31, 2022 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Ricardo Easley. [Entered: 02/03/2022 12:45 PM]
January 20, 2022 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Rebecca Rock McGuigan for Respondents. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [22-10046] (ECF: Rebecca McGuigan) [Entered: 01/20/2022 04:22 PM]
January 20, 2022 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Rebecca Rock McGuigan for Respondents [22-10046] (ECF: Rebecca McGuigan) [Entered: 01/20/2022 04:21 PM]
January 6, 2022 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Ricardo Easley was filed on 12/13/2021. Docket Entry 23. [Entered: 01/10/2022 09:46 AM]
January 6, 2022 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Ricardo Easley on 01/06/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 01/10/2022 09:41 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ricardo Easley v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: RICARDO EASLEY
Represented By: Ricardo Easley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Represented By: Linda Charlene Matthews
Represented By: Rebecca Rock McGuigan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Represented By: Florida Attorney General Service
Represented By: Linda Charlene Matthews
Represented By: Rebecca Rock McGuigan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?