Mitchell Marbury v. Warden III, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: MITCHELL MARBURY
Defendant / Appellee: WARDEN III, WARDEN II and CAPT. CARLA GRAHAM
Case Number: 22-10916
Filed: March 24, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 23, 2022 Mitchell Marbury v. Warden, III, et al.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2022 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Mitchell Marbury. The appellant's brief is due on or before 05/31/2022. [Entered: 04/22/2022 10:22 AM]
April 20, 2022 Consent Form filed by Appellant Mitchell Marbury. [Entered: 04/20/2022 04:44 PM]
April 20, 2022 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Mitchell Marbury. [Entered: 04/20/2022 04:36 PM]
April 12, 2022 NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Mitchell Marbury. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 04/12/2022 04:56 PM]
March 28, 2022 USDC Order Granting appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 03/25/2022. Docket Entry 70. [Entered: 03/28/2022 01:12 PM]
March 24, 2022 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Mitchell Marbury on 03/24/2022. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid.. [Entered: 03/28/2022 01:04 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mitchell Marbury v. Warden III, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MITCHELL MARBURY
Represented By: Mitchell Marbury
Represented By: Warden, St. Clair CF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WARDEN III
Represented By: Steven Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WARDEN II
Represented By: Steven Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CAPT. CARLA GRAHAM
Represented By: Steven Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?