Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Britford v. McClain et al
as 7:2023cv01356
Petitioner:
Randy Earl Britford
Respondent:
Warden III Antonio McClain, Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court and Hon. Steve Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donnie ShropshireIn re: Donnie Shropshire
as 23-11422
Petitioner:
In re: DONNIE SHROPSHIRE
Respondent:
WARDEN III and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Emanger GilbertIn re: Emanger Gilbert
as 22-11587
Petitioner:
In re: EMANGER L. GILBERT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, JOSEPH H. HEADLEY, Warden III, JIMMY K. MOULTON, Cir. Judge and others
Miller, III v. Marshall et al
as 2:2022cv00552
Petitioner:
Alonzo Miller, III
Respondent:
Steve Marshall and Warden III Joseph H. Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Emanger Gilbert
as 22-11031
Petitioner:
In re: EMANGER L. GILBERT
Respondent:
JOSEPH H. HEADLEY, Warden III, JIMMY K. MOULTON, Cir. Judge, PATRICK B. JONES, III, Prosecutor and others
Mitchell Marbury v. Warden III, et al
as 22-10916
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITCHELL MARBURY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN III, WARDEN II and CAPT. CARLA GRAHAM
Best v. Headley et al
as 1:2022cv00275
Petitioner:
Terry D Best and Terry Darray Best
Respondent:
Warden III Joseph H. Headley, Steve Marshall and Joseph H Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colbert v. Dunn
as 2:2021cv01709
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Colbert
Defendant:
Jeff Dunn, Peters, Jefferson Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopson v. State of Alabama et al
as 4:2021cv01594
Petitioner:
Dale Lynn Hopson
Respondent:
State of Alabama, Attorney General State of Alabama and Warden III Joseph H. Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wesson v. Capt Langford
as 6:2021cv00542
Defendant:
Lt, Capt Langford and Warden III
Plaintiff:
William Howard Wesson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
