Riley Mitchell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
| RILEY MITCHELL |
| SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA |
| 22-11310 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Riley Mitchell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of filing Prisoner Financial Statement as to appellant. [Entered: 06/13/2022 03:10 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Florida Attorney General Service for Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Web-Based Stock Ticker Symbol CIP via the court's public web-page and have not filed the CIP via the electronic filing system (CM/ECF). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 05/25/2022 03:37 PM] |
| Amended Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 9675731-2 ] filed by Appellant Riley Mitchell. [Entered: 05/26/2022 04:16 PM] |
| Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Riley Mitchell. [Entered: 05/20/2022 04:11 PM] |
| MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Riley Mitchell. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [9675731-1] [Entered: 05/20/2022 04:07 PM] |
| NOTICE OF CIP FILING DEFICIENCY to Riley Mitchell. You are receiving this notice because you have not completed the Certificate of Interested Persons (CIP). Failure to comply with 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-1 through 26.1-4 may result in dismissal of the case or appeal under 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), return of deficient documents without action, or other sanctions on counsel, the party, or both. If you are an appellant or petitioner, upon expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice, your appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution if the default has not been remedied, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b). If you are an appellee or respondent, no action will be taken on documents submitted until the CIP deficiency is remedied. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-5. [Entered: 05/11/2022 08:05 PM] |
| USDC order granting in part and denying in part COA and denying without prejudice IFP as to Appellant Riley Mitchell was filed on 04/25/2022. Docket Entry 26. No later than 30 days from 04/25/2022, Mitchell must file an amended IFP motion. [Entered: 04/26/2022 09:43 AM] |
| USDC order granting COA in part for ground two and denied in part for all remaining grounds as to Appellant Riley Mitchell was filed on 03/22/2022. Docket Entry 20. [Entered: 04/25/2022 11:01 AM] |
| HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Riley Mitchell on 04/20/2022 USDC motion pending: Motion for certificate of appealability (doc 23); Motion to appeal in forma pauperis (doc 24) filed on 04/20/2022. DE# 24. Fee Status: IFP Pending. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/25/2022 10:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
