Steven Sherman v. A Burleson, et al
| STEVEN DOUGLAS SHERMAN |
| A BURLESON, Officer, PULLEY, J D HOLLAND, Officer, CASTRO, LPN, B BOTTOMS, HSA, E HERNANDEZ-PEREZ, DR, PYBUS, LPN, SCOTT, HSA and CENTURION OF FLORIDA, LLC |
| 22-11686 |
| May 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER: On its own motion, the court DISMISSES the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. CRW, AJ and ALB (See attached order for complete text) [Entered: 07/15/2022 02:56 PM]
|
| Appendix filed [1 VOLUMES - 1 copies] by Party Steven Douglas Sherman. Service date: 06/15/2022 US mail - Appellant Sherman. [Entered: 06/15/2022 11:26 AM] |
| Appellant's brief filed by Steven Douglas Sherman. Service date: 06/15/2022. [Entered: 06/15/2022 11:25 AM] |
| Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Steven Douglas Sherman. [Entered: 06/03/2022 12:32 PM] |
| Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Steven Douglas Sherman. [Entered: 06/01/2022 11:51 AM] |
| CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Steven Douglas Sherman on 05/16/2022. Fee Status: IFP Granted. No hearings to be transcribed. The appellant's brief is due on or before 06/27/2022. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 06/03/2022 as to Appellant Steven Douglas Sherman [Entered: 05/20/2022 11:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
