Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jeremy Brotz v. City of Dexter, Missouri, et al
as 26-2287
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Brotz
Defendant:
City of Dexter, Missouri and Trevor Pulley
PULLEY v. JESS et al
as 2:2026cv03665
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PULLEY
Defendant:
MS. JESS and SCI-DALLAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Detrex Corporation et al
as 3:2026cv00133
Plaintiff:
Green Jones, Jr., Sandra Jones, Mary Judson and others
Defendant:
Detrex Corporation, Italmatch USA Corporation, WSP USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pulley v. Tatum et al
as 3:2026cv00395
Plaintiff:
Aremis Pulley
Defendant:
Esker Tatum, Ralf Stith, Michelle Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al
as 4:2026cv03674
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Washington
Defendant:
Zurich American Insurance Company, Gate Gourmet, Inc., Sierra Signorelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
June v. Warner et al
as 4:2026cv01679
Plaintiff:
Ashley Shareka June
Defendant:
PFG Gabriel Ramone Warner, Deputy Stone Pulley and Marion County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pulley v. USA 2255
as 1:2026cv01189
Petitioner:
Dennis Pulley
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pulley v. Tatum et al
as 3:2026cv00055
Plaintiff:
Aremis Pulley
Defendant:
Esker Tatum, Michelle Grady and Ralf Stith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PULLEY v. ADMON et al
as 2:2026cv00080
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP X PULLEY
Defendant:
RABBI ELISAR ADMON, JOSHUA GREEN, DAVID LUFFY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
