Benjamin Boston v. Gates, et al
| BENJAMIN BOSTON |
| GATES, CODY GOODMAN, AVERY SAVAGE and RODNEY ROBINSON |
| 23-11099 |
| April 6, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights (US not def) |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Benjamin Boston v. Sgt. Gates, et al |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Appellant's AMENDED Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Benjamin Boston. [Entered: 05/16/2023 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 7 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant Benjamin Boston. The appellant's brief is due on or before 06/05/2023. [Entered: 04/28/2023 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 6 Consent Form filed by Appellant Benjamin Boston. [Entered: 04/28/2023 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Benjamin Boston. [Entered: 04/28/2023 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 4 JURISDICTIONAL QUESTION issued as to Benjamin Boston. [Entered: 04/25/2023 05:15 PM] |
| Filing 3 USDC Order Granting appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 04/11/2023. Docket Entry 64. [Entered: 04/11/2023 05:34 PM] |
| Filing 2 USDC order Denying appointment of counsel as to Appellant Benjamin Boston was filed on 04/11/2023. Docket Entry 64. [Entered: 04/11/2023 05:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Benjamin Boston on 04/03/2023. Fee Status: IFP Pending. [Entered: 04/11/2023 05:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
