Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gates v. Jeff Siegel et al
as 3:2026cv01616
Defendant:
John Doe Jane Doe Elkhart County Jail Correctional Officers and Elkhart County Sheriff Jeff Siegel
Plaintiff:
Legacy L. Gates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GRAY v. DIXON et al
as 5:2026cv00313
Defendant:
GATES, JOHN DOE, BRANDY AUSTIN and others
Plaintiff:
KYLE J GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solomon v. Gately et al
as 2:2026cv07074
Defendant:
East Williston Union Free School District and Diane Gately
Plaintiff:
David Solomon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv14178
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Christensen v. Braithwaite, et al
as 26-4147
Defendant:
KEITH NUNLEY, Deputy, KATHY ROBBINS, Deputy, GRETCHEN NUNLEY, Sergeant and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JEFFREY CHRISTENSEN
Elul LLC v. Koranteng et al
as 1:2026cv06661
Defendant:
Patricia Holmes and Kwasi Koranteng
Plaintiff:
Elul LLC doing business as Golden Gate Townhomes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
GATES v. USA
as 3:2026cv00167
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
BRENDAN GATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lyles v. Soderstrom et al
as 3:2026cv50524
Defendant:
City of DeKalb, Illinois, John Doe 4, Police Officer John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Jazariah L. Lyles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunham v. Gates
as 4:2026cv01013
Defendant:
Bill Gates
Plaintiff:
Jacob Tanner Dunham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Direct General Insurance Agency Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv00255
Defendant:
John Does 1-99, Sharon Pharr, Bobbi Gates and others
Plaintiff:
Craigesha Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
