Charles Clark v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
CHARLES J. CLARK |
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA |
23-11105 |
April 4, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Charles J. Clark. Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 6 ]., is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 05/11/2023 04:58 PM] |
Filing 5 Notice of receipt: Certificate of Interested Person as to Appellant Charles J. Clark.. [Entered: 05/04/2023 01:41 PM] |
Filing 6 MOTION to proceed IFP filed by Appellant Charles J. Clark. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [6] [Entered: 05/11/2023 04:51 PM] |
Filing 4 Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Appellant Charles J. Clark. [Entered: 04/21/2023 02:46 PM] |
Filing 3 USDC order denying IFP as to Appellant Charles J. Clark was filed on 04/12/2023. Docket Entry 27. [Entered: 04/12/2023 05:49 PM] |
Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Charles J. Clark was filed on 03/08/2023. Docket Entry 22. [Entered: 04/10/2023 12:06 PM] |
Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Charles J. Clark on 04/03/2023 USDC motion pending: MOTION for IFP filed on 04/03/2023. DE# 25. Fee Status: IFP Pending. No hearings to be transcribed. [Entered: 04/10/2023 12:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.