State of Georgia v. Cathleen Latham
STATE OF GEORGIA |
CATHLEEN ALSTON LATHAM |
23-13362 |
October 6, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Civil Rights Voting |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Over the phone extension granted by clerk as to Attorney William Cromwell for Appellant Cathleen Alston Latham. Appellants brief due on 12/19/2023 as to Appellant Cathleen Alston Latham. Appendix due on 12/26/2023 as to Appellant Cathleen Alston Latham. Any request for a second or subsequent extension of time shall be subject to 11th Cir. R. 31-2(d). [Entered: 11/20/2023 04:44 PM] |
Filing 17 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-13362] (ECF: Francis Wakeford) [Entered: 11/16/2023 12:01 PM] |
Filing 16 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Francis McDonald Wakeford, IV for State of Georgia. Related cases? Yes. [23-13362] (ECF: Francis Wakeford) [Entered: 11/16/2023 11:58 AM] |
Filing 15 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Anna Green Cross for State of Georgia. Related cases? Yes. [23-13362] (ECF: Anna Cross) [Entered: 11/03/2023 11:12 AM] |
Filing 14 Briefing Notice issued to Appellant David James Shafer in 23-13360, Appellant Shawn Micah Tresher Still in 23-13361, Appellant Cathleen Alston Latham in 23-13362. The appellant's brief is due on or before 11/29/2023. The appendix is due no later than 7 days from the filing of the appellant's brief. [23-13360, 23-13361, 23-13362] [Entered: 11/02/2023 04:11 PM] |
Filing 13 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Attorney William Cromwell for Appellant Cathleen Alston Latham. All necessary transcript(s) are on file. [Entered: 11/02/2023 04:01 PM] |
Filing 12 Notice of deficient Transcript Order Form filed by William Cromwell for Cathleen Alston Latham. Please file a motion to file out of time see docket entry 10. Please file within 2 days. [Entered: 11/02/2023 04:00 PM] |
Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION FORM SUBMITTED by Attorney William Cromwell for Appellant Cathleen Alston Latham. Transcript(s) ordered. [23-13362] (ECF: William Cromwell) [Entered: 11/01/2023 01:52 PM] |
Filing 10 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Cathleen Alston Latham. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 11/01/2023 01:23 PM] |
Filing 8 ORDER: Motion to consolidate appeals filed by Appellant David James Shafer is GRANTED by clerk [ # 10052812-2 ]. in 23-13360, ORDER: Motion to consolidate appeals filed by Appellant Shawn Micah Tresher Still is GRANTED by clerk [ # 10053266-2 ]. in 23-13361, ORDER: Motion to consolidate appeals filed by Appellant Cathleen Alston Latham is GRANTED by clerk [ # 7 ]. in 23-13362 [23-13360, 23-13361, 23-13362] [Entered: 10/20/2023 10:53 AM] |
Filing 7 MOTION to consolidate appeals 23-13360, 23-13361 filed by Cathleen Alston Latham. Motion is Unopposed. [7] [23-13362] (ECF: William Cromwell) [Entered: 10/20/2023 10:38 AM] |
Filing 6 No action will be taken on filing submitted by Appellant Cathleen Alston Latham. Motion to consolidate appeals [ # 5 ]., is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. [Entered: 10/20/2023 09:44 AM] |
Filing 5 MOTION to consolidate appeals 23-13360, 23-13361 filed by Cathleen Alston Latham. Motion is Unopposed. [5] [23-13362] (ECF: William Cromwell) [Entered: 10/19/2023 05:35 PM] |
Filing 4 Civil Appeal Statement filed by Attorney William Cromwell for Appellant Cathleen Alston Latham. Related cases? Yes. [23-13362] (ECF: William Cromwell) [Entered: 10/19/2023 05:18 PM] |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by William Cromwell for Cathleen latham. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [23-13362] (ECF: William Cromwell) [Entered: 10/19/2023 05:02 PM] |
Filing 2 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by William G. Cromwell, for Cathleen Latham Alex Bernick for State of Georgia, Christopher Michael Carr for State of Georgia, Anna Green Cross for State of Georgia, John E. Floyd for State of Georgia, Nathan Wade for State of Georgia, Francis McDonald Wakeford, IV for State of Georgia, Fani T. Willis for State of Georgia, John William Wooten for State of Georgia, Daysha D'Anya Young for State of Georgia and William Cromwell for Cathleen Alston Latham. Related cases? Yes. [23-13362] (ECF: William Cromwell) [Entered: 10/19/2023 04:54 PM] |
Filing 1 CIVIL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Cathleen Alston Latham on 10/06/2023. Fee Status: Fee Paid. Awaiting Appellant's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 10/27/2023 as to Appellant Cathleen Alston Latham. Awaiting Appellee's Certificate of Interested Persons due on or before 11/13/2023 as to Appellee State of Georgia [Entered: 10/13/2023 05:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.