Christopher Charles v. P.A. Dittman, et al
CHRISTOPHER MACK CHARLES |
P.A. DITTMAN, S. CARROLL, OKALOOSA CI WARDEN, WALTON CI WARDEN and T. BOWDEN |
23-13775 |
November 16, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 USDC Order Denying appellant Leave to Proceed with Fees NOT Assessed. Filed on 12/06/2023. Docket Entry 39. [Entered: 12/20/2023 02:52 PM] |
Filing 3 The Transcript Order Form has not been filed as to Appellant Christopher Mack Charles. The appellant is hereby notified that, pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless the appellant (1) files a completed Transcript Order Form in this Court AND in the district court OR files in this Court a certificate stating no transcript will be ordered; AND (2) files in this Court a Motion to File Documents Out of Time. [Entered: 12/06/2023 10:20 AM] |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Christopher Mack Charles. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 12/04/2023 09:03 AM] |
Filing 1 PRISONER (PLRA) APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Christopher Mack Charles on 11/16/2023. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 11/17/2023 09:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.