Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Heavilin v. Carrols Corporation et al
as 4:2026cv00077
Plaintiff:
Steven Heavilin
Defendant:
Carrols LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Van Hook v. Smith et al
as 3:2026cv02732
Plaintiff:
Ronald Van Hook
Defendant:
Damon Stihl Smith, Jerry Brown, Brown Realty Co of Rayville Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott et al v. Hedgemon et al
as 3:2026cv00810
Plaintiff:
Denise Scott, Keylan Robinson and Deavon Scott
Defendant:
Johnny Hedgemon, Wydette Williams, East Carroll Parish Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Turner
as 5:2026cv01306
Petitioner:
Robert Gene Carroll
Respondent:
Sheriff Kevin Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson et al v. FCI Lewisburg et al
as 1:2026cv13387
Plaintiff:
Robert Willie Johnson and Conners-Beron
Defendant:
FCI Lewisburg, Essex County Correctional Facility, Meredith A. Vacca and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Carroll, Sr. v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2026cv00352
Petitioner:
James Charles Carroll, Sr.
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Baker v. Doe et al
as 1:2026cv02354
Plaintiff:
Nikki Michelle Baker
Defendant:
John Doe and Dean Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv02971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Carroll v. Runnels et al
as 6:2026cv00347
Plaintiff:
James Charles Carroll, Sr
Defendant:
Curtis R Runnels, Jr, Sgt Courtney M Costales, Sgt Tabitha L White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
