Isaac Louiniste v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
ISAAC RALDY LOUINISTE |
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA |
24-10768 |
March 12, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit |
Prisoner Petitions - Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER: Pursuant to the 11th Cir. R. 42-1(b), this appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution because the appellant Isaac Raldy Louiniste failed to pay the filing and docketing fees to the district court, or alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court and failed to comply with the rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements within the time fixed by the rules [Entered: 04/23/2024 09:01 AM] |
Filing 11 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for certificate of appealability [ # 10 ] filed by Appellant Isaac Raldy LouinisteParty Isaac Raldy Louiniste. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1.. [Entered: 04/17/2024 10:59 AM] |
Filing 10 MOTION for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Isaac Raldy Louiniste. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [10] [Entered: 04/17/2024 10:58 AM] |
Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Attorney Luke Robert Napodano for Appellee Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections. On the same day the CIP is served, any filer represented by counsel must also complete the court's web-based stock ticker symbol certificate at the link here http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/web-based-cip or on the court's website. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1(b). [24-10768] (ECF: Luke Napodano) [Entered: 04/10/2024 08:20 AM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS (CIP) DEFICIENCY issued to Isaac Raldy Louiniste. You have failed to file the standalone CIP. If you are an appellant or petitioner, pursuant to 11th Cir. Rules 26.1-5(c) and 42-1(b), this appeal will be dismissed without further notice upon the expiration of 14 days from the date of this notice unless you both remedy the default(s) AND file a motion to remedy the default(s). [Entered: 04/02/2024 12:33 PM] |
Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT INFORMATION form filed by Party Isaac Raldy Louiniste. No hearings. [Entered: 03/29/2024 12:37 PM] |
Filing 6 Notice that no action will be taken on Motion for extension to file motion for COA [ # 5 ] filed by Appellant Isaac Raldy LouinisteParty Isaac Raldy Louiniste. Reason(s) no action being taken on filing(s): The filing is deficient for failure to comply with this Court's rules on Certificates of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statements. See 11th Cir. R. 26.1-1.. [Entered: 03/20/2024 11:40 AM] |
Filing 4 Notice of receipt: Duplicate NOA as to Appellant Isaac Raldy Louiniste.. [Entered: 03/20/2024 11:38 AM] |
Filing 5 MOTION for extension of time to file a Motion for Certificate of Appealability filed by Appellant Isaac Raldy Louiniste. Opposition to Motion is Unknown [5] [Entered: 03/20/2024 11:39 AM] |
Filing 3 APPEARANCE of Counsel Form filed by Luke R Napodano for Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Related cases? No. [24-10768] (ECF: Luke Napodano) [Entered: 03/14/2024 08:24 AM] |
Filing 2 USDC order denying COA as to Appellant Isaac Raldy Louiniste was filed on 02/09/2024. Docket Entry 11. [Entered: 03/13/2024 04:16 PM] |
Filing 1 HABEAS APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Isaac Raldy Louiniste on 03/11/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Paid. [Entered: 03/13/2024 04:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.