USA v. Christopher Dozier
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER DOZIER
Case Number: 24-12467
Filed: July 31, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2024 Filing 2 CJA appointment issued by this court to Attorney Darcy D. Galnor for Appellant Christopher Dozier. [Entered: 08/01/2024 11:29 AM]
July 31, 2024 Filing 1 CRIMINAL APPEAL DOCKETED. Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Christopher Dozier on 07/30/2024. Fee Status: Fee Not Required. USDC motion pending: MOTION to Withdraw and Request for Replacement Counsel DE 96 filed on 07/30/2024. [Entered: 08/01/2024 11:23 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Christopher Dozier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: U.S. Attorney Service - Middle District of Florida
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER DOZIER
Represented By: Darcy D. Galnor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?