Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ra v. Younce et al
as 1:2024cv01446
Defendant:
David E. Anderson, J. F. Harman, R. Hickman and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dozier, Ashaun Ra and Ashann- Ra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Christopher Dozier
as 24-12467
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER DOZIER
Dozier v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv01126
Petitioner:
Christopher Dozier
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Clarke et al v. Balfour Beatty Communities LLC et al
as 7:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
James Banner, Kayla Banner, Michael Clarke and others
Defendant:
Balfour Beatty Communities LLC, Lackland Family Housing, LLC doing business as Lackland Family Homes, Fort Bliss/White Sands Missile Range Housing LP doing business as Fort Bliss Family Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Banner et al v. Balfour Beatty Communities LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00550
Plaintiff:
Margarete Wilder-Keever, Cody Straight, Rebecca Dozier and others
Defendant:
AETC Housing, LP d/b/a Sheppard AFB Homes, Balfour Beatty Communities LLC, Lackland Family Housing, LLC d/b/a Lackland Family Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dozier v. Carlyle Senior Care of Kingstree LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01303
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dozier, Jr
Defendant:
Carlyle Senior Care of Kingstree LLC and Candice Slavinski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ra v Unknown
as 1:2020cv01456
Plaintiff:
Ashann Ra and Christopher Dozier
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dozier v. Commonwealth Of Virginia
as 1:2009cv00709
Petitioner:
Christopher Dozier
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dozier v. USA
as 5:2008cv00302
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christopher Dozier
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
