National Labor Relations Board v. United Brotherhood of Carpente
Petitioner-Cross-Respondent: National Labor Relations Board
Respondent-Cross-Petitioner: United Brotherhood of Carpenters, Local 43 and New England Regional Council of Carpenters
Case Number: 10-3569
Filed: August 31, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: National Labor Relations Board v. United Brotherhood of Carpente
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner-cross-respondent: National Labor Relations Board
Represented By: Linda Dreeben
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent-cross-petitioner: United Brotherhood of Carpenters, Local 43
Represented By: Christopher N. Souris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent-cross-petitioner: New England Regional Council of Carpenters
Represented By: Christopher N. Souris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?