Cases 1 - 10 of 4,563
MCCONNELL v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
as 1:2025cv00723
Plaintiff:
Carolyn McConnell
Defendant:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
NLRB v. VNS Federal Services, LLC
as 25-1233
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
VNS FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC
Gwynne Wilcox v. Donald Trump, et al
as 25-5057
Plaintiff:
Gwynne A. Wilcox
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States and Marvin E. Kaplan, in his official capacity as Chairman of the National Labor Relations Board
DeBernardi v. National Labor Relations Board
as 25-1310
Petitioner:
DANIEL GEORGE DEBERNARDI, American Postal Workers Union Steward, Officer and United States Postal Service Employee
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
The Dutra Group v. National Labor Relations Board et al
as 1:2025cv00090
Petitioner:
The Dutra Group
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board, William B. Cowen, NLRB Chairman Marvin E. Kaplan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RadNet Management, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
as 25-1178
Petitioner:
RADNET MANAGEMENT, INC., DBA San Fernando Valley Advanced Imaging Center
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Kirin Transportation, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
as 25-417
Petitioner:
KIRIN TRANSPORTATION, INC., DBA Kirin Transportation
Respondent:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
National Labor Relations Board v. Kirin Transportation, Inc.
as 25-391
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
KIRIN TRANSPORTATION, INC.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. BIRD
as 1:2025mc00010
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
TASHA BIRD
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
National Labor Relations Board v. Amentum Services, Inc.
as 25-970
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
AMENTUM SERVICES, INC., f/k/a AECOM Management Services, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
