Cases 1 - 10 of 23
National Labor Relations Board v. Beverly
as 1:2023cv03018
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Andrea Beverly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
National Labor Relations Board v. Lockhart et al
as 8:2023cv02504
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Lawrence Lockhart and Lawrence J. Lockhart Enterprises, LLC
National Labor Relations Board Professional Association v. Federal Service Impasses Panel et al
as 8:2020cv00078
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board Professional Association
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board, Federal Labor Relations Authority and Federal Service Impasses Panel
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 7101
National Labor Relations Board v. American Medical Response Mid-Atlantic, Inc.
as 1:2018cv03009
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
American Medical Response Mid-Atlantic, Inc.
National Labor Relations Board v. Rufus
as 1:2018cv01578
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Asia Rufus
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
National Labor Relations Board v. Gordon
as 8:2018cv00144
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Kharhan Gordon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
National Labor Relations Board v. Statham
as 1:2017cv03219
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Jasper Statham
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
National Labor Relations Board v. Engineering Contractors, Inc. et al
as 8:2017mc00096
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Engineering Contractors, Inc. and ECI of Washington, LLC
National Labor Relations Board v. Jackson
as 1:2016cv02857
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
Ashley Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
National Labor Relations Board v. Stith
as 1:2016cv02856
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Stanley Stith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
