Cases 1 - 10 of 13
In Re Application for Order Enforcing a Subpoena
as 1:2022mc91381
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Defendant:
MPStar Professionals LLC
National Labor Relations Board v. NSL Country Gardens LLC
as 1:2019cv10145
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
NSL Country Gardens LLC
National Labor Relations Board, et al. v. System Council T-6, et al.
as 1:2016cv10922
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board and John J. Walsh, Jr.
Defendant:
System Council T-6 and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Spencer et al v.National Labor Relation Board
as 1:2016cv10706
Plaintiff:
Jerome Spencer and Denice Drayton
Defendant:
National Labor Relation Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Labor Relations Board v. Emerald Green Building Services, LLC
as 1:2015cv13395
Defendant:
Emerald Green Building Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board and Jonathan B. Kreisberg
Intervenor:
Teamsters Local Union No. 25
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv30040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re Application for Order Enforcing a Subpoena
as 1:2014mc91040
Plaintiff:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Paragon Systems, Inc.
Firenze v. National Labor Relations Board et al
as 1:2012cv10880
Plaintiff:
Don Firenze
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board and National Labor Relations Board Union
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
National Labor Relations Board v. Classic Lath & Plastering, Inc. et al
as 1:2009mc10352
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Classic Lath & Plastering, Inc., Fragata Construction, Inc., Ryan Builders, Inc. and others
National Labor Relations Board v. Harding Glass Company, Inc.
as 1:2007mc10228
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Harding Glass Company, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
