National Labor Relations Board v. Rochester Regional Joint Board
Petitioner-Cross-Respondent: National Labor Relations Board
Respondent-Cross-Petitioner: Rochester Regional Joint Board, Local 14A
Movant: Xerox Corporation
Case Number: 16-2954
Filed: August 25, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: National Labor Relations Board v. Rochester Regional Joint Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner-cross-respondent: National Labor Relations Board
Represented By: Linda Dreeben
Represented By: Jill A. Griffin
Represented By: David A. Seid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent-cross-petitioner: Rochester Regional Joint Board, Local 14A
Represented By: Michael Thomas Harren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: Xerox Corporation
Represented By: Kimberly K. Harding
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?