Ripa v. Stony Brook University
| Stony Brook University |
| Anthony John Ripa |
| 19-1293 |
| May 2, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Anthony John Ripa Brief due date as 08/19/2019. Joint Appendix due date as 08/19/2019, FILED.[2582117] [19-1293] [Entered: 06/07/2019 08:32 AM] |
| Filing 22 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Anthony John Ripa, informing Court of proposed due date 08/19/2019, RECEIVED. Service date 06/03/2019 by US mail.[2582033] [19-1293] [Entered: 06/06/2019 04:58 PM] |
| Filing 20 NEW CASE MANAGER Wilson Dudley, ASSIGNED.[2577275] [19-1293] [Entered: 06/03/2019 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 18 NEW CASE MANAGER, Wilson Dudley, copy to pro se appellant, ASSIGNED.[2575760] [19-1293] [Entered: 05/30/2019 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 13 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Anthony John Ripa, FILED. Service date 05/17/2019 by US mail.[2568554] [19-1293] [Entered: 05/21/2019 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Anthony John Ripa, FILED. Service date 05/17/2019 by US mail.[2568551] [19-1293] [Entered: 05/21/2019 10:34 AM] |
Filing 11
ORDER, dated 05/16/2019, dismissing appeal by 06/05/2019, unless Appellant Anthony John Ripa submits, Form D-P, copy to pro se, FILED.[2565582] [19-1293] [Entered: 05/16/2019 12:55 PM]
|
| Filing 10 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2564022] [19-1293] [Entered: 05/15/2019 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 9 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Anthony John Ripa, district court receipt # 27720, FILED.[2564021] [19-1293] [Entered: 05/15/2019 08:55 AM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, David Lawrence, [ # 7 ], in place of attorney Barbara Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[2555454] [19-1293] [Entered: 05/03/2019 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Stony Brook University, FILED. Service date 05/03/2019 by US mail. [2555433] [19-1293] [Entered: 05/03/2019 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[2555260] [19-1293] [Entered: 05/03/2019 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[2555251] [19-1293] [Entered: 05/03/2019 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 04/04/2019, RECEIVED.[2555247] [19-1293] [Entered: 05/03/2019 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, dated 04/04/2019, RECEIVED.[2555245] [19-1293] [Entered: 05/03/2019 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Anthony John Ripa, FILED. [2555236] [19-1293] [Entered: 05/03/2019 12:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ripa v. Stony Brook University | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Stony Brook University | |
| Represented By: | David Lawrence III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Anthony John Ripa | |
| Represented By: | Anthony John Ripa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
