National Labor Relations Board v. Nico Asphalt Paving, Inc.
| National Labor Relations Board |
| Nico Asphalt Paving, Inc., and it's Successor in Interest and Alter Ego, City Wide Paving, Inc. |
| 20-77 |
| January 9, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, David A Seid for National Labor Relations Board, in case 20-77, [ # 7 ], ADDED.[2753012] [20-77] [Entered: 01/15/2020 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Julie Brock Broido for National Labor Relations Board, in case 20-77, [ # 6 ], ADDED.[2753011] [20-77] [Entered: 01/15/2020 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Petitioner National Labor Relations Board, FILED. Service date 01/15/2020 by CM/ECF. [2752899] [20-77] [Entered: 01/15/2020 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Petitioner National Labor Relations Board, FILED. Service date 01/15/2020 by CM/ECF. [2752889] [20-77] [Entered: 01/15/2020 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner National Labor Relations Board, FILED. Service date 01/13/2020 by CM/ECF.[2750012] [20-77] [Entered: 01/13/2020 07:27 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [2749870] [20-77] [Entered: 01/10/2020 05:06 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 11/06/2019, RECEIVED.[2749855] [20-77] [Entered: 01/10/2020 05:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner National Labor Relations Board, FILED. [2749848] [20-77] [Entered: 01/10/2020 04:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
