Canfield v. Ferguson
| Robert Canfield, Bonnie Kartz, Latrecia Onunkwor, Diana Weaver, David Ostermeyer, Mark Mendon and Jill Pehlman |
| Michael L. Ferguson, Myrl C. Jeffcoat, Deborah Smith, on behalf of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan, Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc., DST Systems, Inc., The Advisory Committee of the DST Systems, Inc. 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan and The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of DST Systems, Inc. |
| 21-2110 |
| August 31, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Robert Canfield, Bonnie Kartz, Mark Mendon, Latrecia Onunkwor, David Ostermeyer, Jill Pehlman and Diana Weaver, FILED. Service date 09/02/2021 by CM/ECF.[3167381] [21-2110] [Entered: 09/02/2021 08:41 PM] |
| Filing 6 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Nick Kurt, Esq. for Respondent Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb Inc., electronically informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[3166256] [21-2110] [Entered: 09/01/2021 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 DOCKET SHEET, RECEIVED.[3166243] [21-2110] [Entered: 09/01/2021 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, dated 08/17/2021, RECEIVED.[3166238] [21-2110] [Entered: 09/01/2021 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 MOTION, for leave to appeal (FRCP23(f)), on behalf of Petitioner Robert Canfield, Bonnie Kartz, Mark Mendon, Latrecia Onunkwor, David Ostermeyer, Jill Pehlman and Diana Weaver, FILED. Service date 09/01/2021 by email, CM/ECF.[3166234] [21-2110] [Entered: 09/01/2021 12:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
