Brooks v. The Doe Fund, Inc.
| Anthony Wiggins |
| Terry Cooper, The Doe Fund, Inc. and James Washington |
| Gregory Brooks |
| 21-31 |
| January 5, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION, TO EXTEND TIME, [ # 16 ],[ # 16 ], on behalf of Appellant Gregory Brooks, FILED.[3045877] [21-31] [Entered: 02/27/2021 10:21 PM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to extend time. Appellant must file his Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, Form D-P, and pay the fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on or before March 25, 2021. The appeal is dismissed effective March 25, 2021 if Appellant fails to file any of the above-mentioned documents. [ # 16 ] filed by Appellant Gregory Brooks, FILED. [3045391][19] [21-31] [Entered: 02/26/2021 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION, to extend time, to change venue, on behalf of Appellant Gregory Brooks, FILED. Service date 02/23/2021 by US mail.[3045154] [21-31] [Entered: 02/26/2021 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 15 INDEX/ROA NOTICE, to Appellant Gregory Brooks, past due material(s) to be submitted by 02/25/2021, SENT.[3034270] [21-31] [Entered: 02/11/2021 08:22 AM] |
Filing 14
ORDER, dated 02/11/2021, dismissing appeal by 03/04/2021, unless Appellant Gregory Brooks, submits fee or moves to proceed in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3034263] [21-31] [Entered: 02/11/2021 08:12 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER, dated 02/11/2021, dismissing appeal by 03/04/2021, unless Appellant Gregory Brooks, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3034260] [21-31] [Entered: 02/11/2021 08:08 AM]
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER, dated 02/11/2021, dismissing appeal by 03/04/2021, unless Appellant Gregory Brooks, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3034255] [21-31] [Entered: 02/11/2021 08:03 AM]
|
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Letter, [9], on behalf of Appellant Gregory Brooks, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3029828] [21-31] [Entered: 02/04/2021 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 9 LETTER, dated 01/18/2021, on behalf of Appellant Gregory Brooks, requesting an extension of time to file documents, RECEIVED. Service date 01/18/2021 by US mail.[3029718] [21-31] [Entered: 02/04/2021 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Terry Cooper, FILED. Service date 01/19/2021 by CM/ECF.[3016413] [21-31] [Entered: 01/19/2021 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Steven J. Seidenfeld for James Washington and The Doe Fund, Inc., in case 21-31, [ # 6 ], ADDED.[3014772] [21-31] [Entered: 01/15/2021 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee The Doe Fund, Inc. and James Washington, FILED. Service date 01/15/2021 by US mail. [3014497] [21-31] [Entered: 01/15/2021 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee The Doe Fund, Inc. and James Washington, FILED. Service date 01/15/2021 by US mail.[3014491] [21-31] [Entered: 01/15/2021 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3009528] [21-31] [Entered: 01/08/2021 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/31/2020, RECEIVED.[3009523] [21-31] [Entered: 01/08/2021 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, dated 03/31/2020, RECEIVED.[3009522] [21-31] [Entered: 01/08/2021 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Gregory Bloom, FILED. [3009513] [21-31] [Entered: 01/08/2021 01:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
