National Labor Relations Board v. ADT, LLC
| National Labor Relations Board |
| ADT LLC, DBA ADT Security Services |
| 21-974 |
| April 20, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 06/01/2021, determining the appeal to NLRB, ISSUED.[Mandate][3111764] [21-974] [Entered: 06/01/2021 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 23 CERTIFIED ORDER, dated 06/01/2021, to NLRB, ISSUED.[3111758] [21-974] [Entered: 06/01/2021 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 22 SO-ORDERED SUMMARY ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, by RSP, RJL, KAPLAN, FILED.[3111750] [21-974] [Entered: 06/01/2021 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 21 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yana Segal, ASSIGNED.[3111733] [21-974] [Entered: 06/01/2021 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 17 SUBMITTED NOTICE, to attorneys/parties, TRANSMITTED.[3101080] [21-974] [Entered: 05/14/2021 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 12 ANSWER TO APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ORDER, on behalf of Respondent ADT LLC, FILED. Service date 05/11/2021 by US mail.[3097853] [21-974] [Entered: 05/11/2021 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY, Norma Manjarrez for ADT LLC, in case 21-974, [ # 10 ], ADDED.[3094157] [21-974] [Entered: 05/05/2021 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Respondent ADT LLC, FILED. Service date 05/04/2021 by CM/ECF. [3093314] [21-974] [Entered: 05/04/2021 05:32 PM] |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Respondent ADT LLC, FILED. Service date 05/04/2021 by CM/ECF.[3093259] [21-974] [Entered: 05/04/2021 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 8 FORM C/A, on behalf of Petitioner National Labor Relations Board, FILED. Service date 04/22/2021 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3084202] [21-974] [Entered: 04/22/2021 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner National Labor Relations Board, FILED. Service date 04/22/2021 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3084197] [21-974] [Entered: 04/22/2021 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [3082141] [21-974] [Entered: 04/21/2021 08:05 AM] |
| Filing 6 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD ON APPEAL, FILED.[3082316] [21-974] [Entered: 04/21/2021 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED CONSENT JUDGMENT ORDER, RECEIVED.[3082139] [21-974] [Entered: 04/21/2021 08:02 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 04/13/2021, RECEIVED.[3082136] [21-974] [Entered: 04/21/2021 07:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AGENCY ORDER on consent, on behalf of Petitioner National Labor Relations Board, FILED. [3082131] [21-974] [Entered: 04/21/2021 07:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: National Labor Relations Board v. ADT, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board | |
| Represented By: | Ruth E. Burdick Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ADT LLC, DBA ADT Security Services | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy Moritz Esq. |
| Represented By: | Norma Manjarrez Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
