United States of America v. Rodriguez
| LUIS RODRIGUEZ, REINALDO COLON OLIVERAS, SALVADOR CRESPO, LUIS CEPEDA, RAMON OQUENDO, Pops, THOMAS MARRA, Chucho, JAIME RODRIGUEZ, HECTOR ESQUILIN CORDERO, Junito, June, Doogie, Mimo and CARLOS OMAR ABREU-SANCHEZ |
| LANDDY RODRIGUEZ and Oso |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 23-6568 |
| June 2, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 11/03/2023, on behalf of Appellant Landdy Rodriguez, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 11/03/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 11/03/2023 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 17 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 10/20/2023, on behalf of Appellant Landdy Rodriguez, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 10/20/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 10/20/2023 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 16 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 10/06/2023, on behalf of Appellant Landdy Rodriguez, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 10/06/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 10/06/2023 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 15 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 09/22/2023, on behalf of Appellant Landdy Rodriguez, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 09/22/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/22/2023 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 14 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 09/08/2023, on behalf of Appellant Landdy Rodriguez, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 09/08/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/08/2023 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 13 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 08/25/2023, on behalf of Appellant Landdy Rodriguez, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 08/25/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 08/25/2023 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 12 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 08/11/2023, on behalf of Appellant Landdy Rodriguez, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 08/11/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 08/11/2023 10:32 AM] [Edited: 08/11/2023 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 11 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 07/28/2023, on behalf of Appellant Landdy Rodriguez, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 07/28/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 07/28/2023 03:55 PM] [Edited: 07/31/2023 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 10 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated 07/14/2023, on behalf of Appellant Landdy Rodriguez, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 07/14/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 07/14/2023 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 9 COURT REPORTER'S ACKNOWLEDGMENT, on behalf of Appellant Landdy Rodriguez, FILED. Service date 07/06/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 07/10/2023 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 8 NEW CASE MANAGER, Oscar Rivas, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 06/20/2023 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Landdy Rodriguez, FILED. Service date 06/16/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/16/2023 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 6 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Landdy Rodriguez, FILED. Service date 06/13/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/13/2023 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY, Kenneth L. Gresham for Appellee United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 06/12/2023 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 06/05/2023 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 06/07/2023 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 05/25/2023 RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/02/2023 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Landdy Rodriguez, FILED. [Entered: 06/02/2023 01:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
