Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
US v. De La Cruz-Vazquez
as 26-1189
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JOSE A. DE LA CRUZ-VAZQUEZ, a/k/a Oso, a/k/a Jose De La Cruz-Vazquez
UMB Bank NA v. MidCon Gathering LLC et al
as 3:2026cv00592
Plaintiff:
UMB Bank NA
Defendant:
MidCon Gathering LLC, Hawkeye Exploration & Production LLC, Apexway Corp and others
Interested Party:
Vince Parker
Counter-Claimant:
MidCon Gathering LLC
Counter-Defendant:
UMB Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
US v. De Jesus-Torres
as 26-1142
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
JEONELL DE JESUS-TORRES, t/n Jeonel Wilfredo De Jesus-Torres, a/k/a Panda, a/k/a Oso
United States of America v. Salazar
as 25-6324
Defendant:
OMAR SALAZAR, Oso and Umar Ovalle
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jesus Jorge Milanes v. Chapel of the Roses Mortuary et al
as 2:2025cv05220
Plaintiff:
Jesus Jorge Milanes
Defendant:
Chapel of the Roses Mortuary, S.E. Combined Services of California, Inc., SCI Shared Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
United States of America v. Amaya?Sanchez (Villalta)
as 25-1263
Defendant:
OMAR ANTONIO VILLALTA, EDWIN AMAYA-SANCHEZ, WILLIAM CASTELLANOS and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00042
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv09162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
United States of America v. Amaya-Sanchez (Hernandez)
as 24-352
Defendant:
EDWIN AMAYA-SANCHEZ, WILLIAMS CASTELLANOS, ELMER ALEXANDER LOPEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
