United States of America v. Haxhaj (Yeltsin Beltran)
| Light, Fresh, IVIS PERDOMO, Bebe, White Mike, BORIS BELTRAN, FRANCISCO ORTEGA, Lenny, YELTSIN BELTRAN, Jerm, DRILON HAXHAJ, SHPENDIM HAXHAJ, LUCAS CHAJECKI, JEREMY CEDENO and Yells |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 24-3038 |
| November 21, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 TRANSCRIPT STATUS UPDATE LETTER, dated [-], on behalf of Appellant Yeltsin Beltran, informing court of transcript delays, RECEIVED. Service date 01/08/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/08/2025 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 21 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at entry 20, on behalf of Appellant Yeltsin Beltran, FILED. [Entered: 12/27/2024 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 20 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Yeltsin Beltran, FILED. Service date 12/27/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/27/2024 08:33 AM] |
| Filing 19 NEW CASE MANAGER, Oscar Rivas, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 12/27/2024 08:29 AM] |
| Filing 18 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at docket entry 16, on behalf of Appellant Yeltsin Beltran, FILED. [Entered: 12/20/2024 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 17 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Yeltsin Beltran, FILED. Service date 12/17/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/17/2024 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 16 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Yeltsin Beltran, FILED. Service date 12/13/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/13/2024 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 15 CJA COUNSEL, James M. Branden for Appellant Yeltsin Beltran, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 12/11/2024 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY, James Matthew Branden, in place of attorney Daniel Lawrence Stein, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 12/11/2024 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 13 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to be relieved as counsel and assigning new CJA counsel, at docket entry 11, on behalf of Appellant Yeltsin Beltran, FILED. [Entered: 12/11/2024 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, for Motion to be relieved as counsel, on behalf of Appellant Yeltsin Beltran, FILED. Service date 12/03/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/03/2024 05:32 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION, to be relieved as counsel, on behalf of Appellant Yeltsin Beltran, FILED. Service date 12/03/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/03/2024 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 10 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Yeltsin Beltran, FILED. Service date 12/03/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/03/2024 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Yeltsin Beltran, FILED. Service date 12/03/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/03/2024 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Brandon Douglas Harper, for Appellee United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 11/28/2024 05:51 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Frank Balsamello, for Appellee United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 11/28/2024 05:49 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 11/25/2024 11:03 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 11/22/2024 10:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Yeltsin Beltran, received on 11/19/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 11/21/2024 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 11/22/2024 12:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 11/07/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 11/21/2024 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Yeltsin Beltran, FILED. [Entered: 11/21/2024 09:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
