Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Anna Kapellan v. Jersey City Medical Center, et al
as 26-2657
Plaintiff:
ANNA KAPELLAN
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY MEDICAL CENTER, Inc., RWJ BARNABAS HEALTH INC, MS. MARIA CHRISTINA BERNARD and others
Bebee v. Stuff
as 1:2026cv01467
Petitioner:
LaJuan Bebee
Respondent:
Warden Angela Stuff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anna Kapellan v. Jersey City Medical Center, et al
as 26-2272
Plaintiff:
ANNA KAPELLAN
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY MEDICAL CENTER, Inc., RWJ BARNABAS HEALTH INC, MS. MARIA CHRISTINA BERNARD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Anna Kapellan v. Jersey City Medical Center, et al
as 26-1803
Plaintiff:
ANNA KAPELLAN
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY MEDICAL CENTER, Inc., RWJ BARNABAS HEALTH INC, MS. MARIA CHRISTINA BERNARD and others
Anna Kapellan v. Jersey City Medical Center, et al
as 26-1804
Plaintiff:
ANNA KAPELLAN
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY MEDICAL CENTER, Inc., RWJ BARNABAS HEALTH INC, MS. MARIA CHRISTINA BERNARD and others
United States of America v. Salaman
as 26-713
Defendant:
ISMAEL HEREDIA, CHRISTIAN LOPEZ, MELVIN SANTIAGO and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bridget Botto v. Bebe Stores Inc.
as 2:2026cv01724
Plaintiff:
Bridget Botto
Defendant:
Bebe Stores Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Almeyda, et al. v. County of Kern, et al.
as 1:2026cv00250
Plaintiff:
Marisol Almeyda and Tony Scott
Defendant:
County of Kern, Logan Bebee, Nathan Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anna Kapellan v. Jersey City Medical Center, et al
as 26-1028
Plaintiff:
ANNA KAPELLAN
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY MEDICAL CENTER, Inc., MS. MARIA CHRISTINA BERNARD, MS. JESSICA ARAUZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
