United States of America v. James (Francis)
| DEXTER FRANCIS, JOHN MARK, HUBERT BROWN, JEROME BARKER, MATTHEW BOWEN, MECCA HUFFLER, KRIT MARCUS, BRIAN MCCLATCHIE, AVIIN DEMIN, EION LEWIS, HARRY JAMES, Christian Dexter, Francis Dexter, Andre Huskin, Wayne Hoyt, Allen Dale Moffett, Jihad Muhammed, Coolman, Junks, Juncks, Michael Roberts, Marlon Bennett, Hubert Baxter, GAIL OSBOURNE, Naya, John Moses, Chiny, MICHAEL TURNER, Jack E. Orbin, Junior, Trini, Bingy, ANTHONY THOMAS, LAWANDA MORALDO, Kevin John, Fly, Cidroi Dyett, Nigel Hall, Zack, Bruiser, YVETTE CAMPBELL, "Trevor John" and Trevor John |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 25-1075 |
| April 29, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yenni Liu, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 09/11/2025 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION ORDER, dismissing the appeal and denying as unnecessary motion for certificate of appealability at docket entry 13, on behalf of Appellant Dexter Francis, by JMW, SLC, RJS, copy to pro se Appellant, FILED. [Entered: 09/11/2025 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 16 ADDRESS CHANGE REQUEST, dated 06/30/2025, COMPLETED. [Entered: 07/16/2025 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 17 UNDELIVERABLE MAIL, for to USCA from USPS, received on 07/10/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 07/17/2025 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 15 LETTER, dated 06/30/2025, informing of change of address, on behalf of Appellant Dexter Francis, RECEIVED. Service date 07/09/2025 by No Service. [Entered: 07/16/2025 09:56 AM] |
Filing 14
ORDER, vacating previous order entry 11 dated 05/29/2025, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 06/02/2025 10:29 AM]
|
Filing 11
ORDER, dated 05/29/2025, stating this appeal may be subject to dismissal by 06/20/2025, unless Appellant Dexter Francis, submits Form B, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 05/29/2025 09:50 AM]
|
| Filing 13 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Dexter Francis, FILED. Service date 05/14/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 05/30/2025 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 12 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Dexter Francis, FILED. Service date 05/14/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 05/30/2025 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 10 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Dexter Francis, informing Court of proposed due date 08/14/2025, RECEIVED. Service date 05/14/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 05/27/2025 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Dexter Francis, FILED. Service date 05/14/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 05/27/2025 09:25 AM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of AppelleeUSA United States of America, FILED. Service date 05/06/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 05/06/2025 11:03 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Kamil Ammari, in place of attorney Amy Busa, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 05/06/2025 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 04/30/2025 09:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 04/30/2025 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 04/30/2025 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 3 CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Dexter Francis, recieved on 04/25/2025, OPENED. [Entered: 04/30/2025 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT TEXT ORDER, dated 04/07/2025, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/30/2025 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Dexter Francis, FILED. [Entered: 04/30/2025 09:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.