Cases 1 - 10 of 2,891
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Max Delphin v. Armand
as 1:2024cv03396
Other:
Guy-max delphin
Defendant:
Jacques Junior Armand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Lemes Costa, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2817
Petitioner:
SILAS JUNIOR MARTINS LEMES COSTA, MIGUEL MARTINS REGES COSTA and JULYANNA COSTA REGES MENDES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ortiz et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Raymond P. Ortiz, Daniel Reichman and Torres Junior Vicente
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
In re: Arthur Jones
as 24-1351
Petitioner:
In re: ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
Patten v. Thompson et al
as 0:2024cv60676
Plaintiff:
Barrington Roderick Patten
Defendant:
Stevie Tyrone Thompson, Harry James Robinson, II, Lamont James Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Raj Jones v. Miami-Dade County, et al
as 24-11275
Plaintiff:
RAJ JONES
Defendant:
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, DANIEL JUNIOR, PABLO VALDES and others
Byrd et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00488
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Byrd, Derek Junior Adams, Jeffrey O'Brien Anglim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Daughtry, Phillip v. Parret
as 2:2024cv14111
Plaintiff:
Phillip Junior Daughtry
Defendant:
John Parret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
