Cases filed in District of Columbia
MORRIS v. BARR
as 1:2020cv00814
Petitioner: MIGUEL JUNIOR MORRIS
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00803
Defendant: ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
PATTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv00686
Defendant: ASHLEY MOODY, CARLOS GIMENEZ, WELLPATH RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff: DIMITRI PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
RABORG TR v. CANTOR FITZGERALD FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00176
Defendant: J.H. WHITNEY AND COMPANY, INC., RAJU HUSSAIN, AXEL THEIS and others
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER HENRY RABORG TR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00203
Plaintiff: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Movant: JAMES DUBOSE , JUNIOR GLOVER , FAMILY UNIT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Type: Civil Rights Voting
JUNIOR v. JOHNSON
as 1:2010cv01742
Plaintiff: LATANYA M. JUNIOR
Defendant: MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAYHILL THERAPEUTICS, INC. et al v. KAPPOS
as 1:2009cv02238
Plaintiff: BAYHILL THERAPEUTICS, INC. and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
Defendant: DAVID J. KAPPOS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Type: Other Statutes None
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. JUNIOR
as 1:2007cv00381
Plaintiff: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: LUIZ GONZAGA MURAT JUNIOR
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?