Jordan v. Department of Correction
| VICTOR L. JORDAN, SR. |
| LAURA M. OLIVARES, GERALD VALLETTA, MD, Dr. CRAIG BURNS, MH, CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Commissioner ANGEL QUIROS, WASHINGTON, Warden, MCKNISH, Deputy Warden, COLLEEN GALLAGHER, COOADA, JENNIFER REIS, Warden, CAROLINE SANDERS, LPRN, Dr. ROBERT RICHESON, MICHEL NICHOLSON, CNE, WRIGHT, Captain, JOHN DOE, 1, Lieutenant, JOHN DOE, 2, JOHN DOE, 3, JOHN DOE, 4, RODRIGUEZ, District Administrator, DEBRA CRUZ, APRN, G. LEE, CC, POP Mango, M. GREENE, WILLIAM MULLIGAN, DAVID MAIGA, KAREN MARTUCCI, JACKSON, Captain and Dr. KOCIENDA, MH |
| 26-1704 |
| June 24, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 06/24/2026 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 6 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED. [Entered: 06/24/2026 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 5 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Victor L. Jordan, Sr., OPENED. [Entered: 06/24/2026 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 06/24/2026 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 06/16/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/24/2026 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT RULING AND ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO COMPEL, dated 05/15/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/24/2026 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Victor L. Jordan, Sr., FILED. [Entered: 06/24/2026 01:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.