United States of America v. Vasquez-Drew (Roca-Suarez)
| CARLOS ROBLEDO-ANEZ, JHON CAHUANA-BARRIENTOS, JUAN CARLOS SERRATE-MIDDAGH, MAXIMILIANO DAVILA-PEREZ, PERCY ARTURO VASQUEZ-DREW, OSVALDO LONDONO-VANEGAS, VICTOR ROJAS-BASCOPE, Gafas, JORGE ROCA-SUAREZ, HERLAND MONTANO-FERNANDEZ, JHEYSON MONTANO-FERNANDEZ, OMAR ROJAS-ECHEVARRIA, ROBERTO MOISES BANZER, ROMULO RAMIREZ-RODRIGUEZ, Jota, Peruvian J and Kacay |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 26-2280 |
| August 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, David Robles, for Appellee United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 08/17/2026 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Chelsea L. Scism, for Appellee United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 08/17/2026 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 08/16/2026 06:47 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 08/15/2026 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTE: See lead case, 26-767, containing complete set of docket entries. [Entered: 08/14/2026 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 4 CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Jorge Roca-Suarez, OPENED. [Entered: 08/14/2026 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 08/14/2026 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 07/30/2026, RECEIVED. [Entered: 08/14/2026 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Jorge Roca-Suarez, FILED. [Entered: 08/14/2026 12:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.