Cases 1 - 10 of 17
United States of America v. Vasquez-Drew (Roca-Suarez)
as 26-2280
Defendant:
CARLOS ROBLEDO-ANEZ, JHON CAHUANA-BARRIENTOS, JUAN CARLOS SERRATE-MIDDAGH and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Vasquez-Drew (Davila-Perez)
as 26-767
Defendant:
CARLOS ROBLEDO-ANEZ, JHON CAHUANA-BARRIENTOS, JUAN CARLOS SERRATE-MIDDAGH and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Vasquez?Drew (Robledo-Anez)
as 25-2379
Defendant:
CARLOS ROBLEDO-ANEZ, JHON CAHUANA-BARRIENTOS, PERCY ARTURO VASQUEZ-DREW and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Vasquez-Drew (Serrate-Middagh)
as 25-2227
Defendant:
JUAN CARLOS SERRATE-MIDDAGH, CARLOS ROBLEDO-ANEZ, JHON CAHUANA-BARRIENTOS and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Raul Torres Cubides
as 25-1890
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RAUL ORLANDO TORRES CUBIDES, a/k/a Jose Jota, a/k/a Jose J., a/k/a El Don, a/k/a El Viejo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
USA v. Jhon Sanchez-Portocarrero
as 19-12206
Defendant / Appellant:
JHON JAIRO SANCHEZ-PORTOCARRERO, a.k.a. Jota
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv02942
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
USA v. John Marroquin-Patino
as 13-20188
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN ALEX MARROQUIN-PATINO, also known as Jota, also known as FNU LNU
United States of America v. Nunez-Fermin
as 13-325
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alfredo Nunez-Fermin, Adolman Dilone-Almonte, AKA Tamangari, Francisco Gonzalez Uribe, AKA Patron and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jose Mosquera-Prado, AKA El Negro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
