Robert Taylor v. Attorney General United State
Petitioner: ROBERT LLOYD TAYLOR
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 12-3242
Filed: August 13, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3011119469 NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Robert Lloyd Taylor requesting Motion to file an overlength Petition for Rehearing. Compliance due 01/10/2013.
August 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3010986057 ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert Taylor v. Attorney General United State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ROBERT LLOYD TAYLOR
Represented By: Robert Lloyd Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Eric H. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?