Bao Chen v. Attorney General United State
| BAO HUI CHEN |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 13-1777 |
| March 19, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Bao Chen v. Attorney General United States |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3011399785
NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: SMITH, GREENAWAY JR. and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 5.
|
|
Filing
3011201010
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Bao Chen v. Attorney General United State | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: BAO HUI CHEN | |
| Represented By: | Wendy Tso |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Eric H. Holder |
| Represented By: | Thomas W. Hussey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
