Laudis Lemus Retana v. Attorney General United State
Petitioner:
LAUDIS SADABI LEMUS RETANA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number:
13-1799
Filed:
March 21, 2013
Court:
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit:
Other
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Date Filed | Description |
|---|---|
| August 12, 2013 | Laudis Lemus Retana v. Attorney General United States |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| August 12, 2013 | 3011354361 |
NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: SMITH, GREENAWAY, JR. and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 3.
|
| March 21, 2013 | 3011204543 |
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record.
|
| Search for this case: Laudis Lemus Retana v. Attorney General United State | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: LAUDIS SADABI LEMUS RETANA | |
| Represented By: | Frederic S. Rosengarten |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Eric H. Holder |
| Represented By: | Thomas W. Hussey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.