James Anderson v. David DiGuglielmo, et al

Defendant - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES R. ANDERSON
Case Number: 13-1883
Filed: April 2, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Search for this case: James Anderson v. David DiGuglielmo, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Thomas W. Dolgenos
Represented By: Robert M. Falin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Represented By: Thomas W. Dolgenos
Represented By: Robert M. Falin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Represented By: Thomas W. Dolgenos
Represented By: Robert M. Falin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JAMES R. ANDERSON
Represented By: James R. Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.