Duquesne Light Holdings Inc v. Commissioner of Internal Reven
| DUQUESNE LIGHT HOLDINGS INC |
| COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE |
| 14-1743 |
| March 31, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Duquesne Light Holdings Inc v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3012662649
PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: AMBRO, HARDIMAN and KRAUSE, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 58. Judge: AMBRO Authoring, Judge: HARDIMAN Dissenting.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Duquesne Light Holdings Inc v. Commissioner of Internal Reven | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: DUQUESNE LIGHT HOLDINGS INC | |
| Represented By: | Miriam L. Fisher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE | |
| Represented By: | Joseph P. Grant |
| Represented By: | Mary H. Weber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
