Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,366
Estate of James P. Connelly, et al v. CIR
as 22-3090
Petitioner / Appellant: CHRISTINE K. CONNELLY and ESTATE OF JAMES P. CONNELLY, By personal representative CHRISTINE K. CONNELLY
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Christine Connelly, et al v. CIR
as 22-3091
Petitioner / Appellant: CHRISTINE K. CONNELLY and ESTATE OF JAMES P. CONNELLY, By personal representative CHRISTINE K. CONNELLY
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Christine Connelly, et al v. CIR
as 22-3092
Petitioner / Appellant: CHRISTINE K. CONNELLY and ESTATE OF JAMES P. CONNELLY, By personal representative CHRISTINE K. CONNELLY
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Christine Connelly, et al v. CIR
as 22-3093
Petitioner / Appellant: CHRISTINE K. CONNELLY and ESTATE OF JAMES P. CONNELLY, By personal representative CHRISTINE K. CONNELLY
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Sharma v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 4:2022cv00755
Plaintiff: Narendra Sharma
Defendant: Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6532 IRS: Refund of Tax Penalty
Ray v. CIR
as 22-60624
Petitioner / Appellant: Ames D. Ray
Respondent / Appellee: Commissioner of Internal Revenue
FRAUSTO v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
as 1:2022cv03528
Plaintiff: MARCO FRAUSTO
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ryan Roath v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 22-13799
Petitioner / Appellant: RYAN MICHAEL ROATH
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Maureen Robinson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 22-3120
Petitioner / Appellant: MAUREEN ROBINSON
Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Joseph McDonald v. CIR
as 22-70246
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSEPH A. MCDONALD
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?