Si Min Cen v. Attorney General United States
SI MIN CEN |
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
14-4831 |
December 29, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MANDATE ISSUED, filed. (TMM) |
PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: SHWARTZ, KRAUSE and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 44. Judge: KRAUSE Authoring. (TMM) |
JUDGMENT, ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this Court that the Petition for Review filed December 29, 2014 is GRANTED. The decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals issued on December 3, 2014, is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Opinion of this Court. Costs shall not be taxed. (TMM) |
COURT MINUTES OF ARGUED/SUBMITTED CASES. [14-4831, 14-3846, 14-4349, 14-4350, 14-4351, 14-4829, 15-1100, 15-1301, 15-1319] (CMH) |
ECF FILER: ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed by Attorney Robert M. Stalzer, Esq. for Respondent Attorney General United States of America. Certificate of Service dated 10/05/2015. (RMS) |
ARGUED on Monday, October 5, 2015. Panel: SHWARTZ, KRAUSE and *GREENBERG, Circuit Judges. Scott E. Bratton arguing for Petitioner Si Min Cen; Robert M. Stalzer arguing for Respondent Attorney General United States of America. *Participated via audio conference. (CMH) |
CLERK'S LETTER to counsel written at the direction of the Court. At the direction of the Court, please see the attached letter which addresses argument on Monday, October 5, 2015 in this case. (TLG) |
Oral Argument Notification for Monday, 10/05/2015. (TLG) |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert Michael Stalzer on behalf of Respondent(s) Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of the United States. (RMS) |
ECF FILER: ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed by Attorney Jeffrey R. Meyer, Esq. for Respondent Attorney General United States of America. Certificate of Service dated 07/24/2015. (JRM) |
ECF FILER: ARGUMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT filed by Attorney Scott E. Bratton, Esq. for Petitioner Si Min Cen. Certificate of Service dated 07/24/2015. (SEB) |
Calendared for Tuesday, 10/06/2015. (TLG) |
ECF FILER: LETTER from Attorney Scott E. Bratton, Esq. for Petitioner Si Min Cen. Counsel is unavailable for the following dates: 10/05/2015, 10/09/2015, (SEB) |
HARD COPY RECEIVED from Petitioner Si Min Cen - Reply Brief. Copies: 7. (RS) |
HARD COPY RECEIVED from Petitioner Si Min Cen - Addendum to Reply Brief. Copies: 7. (RS) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER (Clerk) directing Attorney Scott E. Bratton, Esq. for Petitioner Si Min Cen to submit seven (7) hard copies for the Reply Brief, e-filed on 06/12/15, filed. Due on or before 06/29/2015. (MS) |
NON COMPLIANCE Order issued to Petitioner Si Min Cen regarding the reply brief filed on 06/12/2015. Please open the attachment for the full text of the Order. Compliance due by 06/18/2015. (MS) |
ECF FILER: SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC ADDENDUM to BRIEF on behalf of Petitioner Si Min Cen containing Certification that electroinic version is Identical to the the paper copies , filed. Certificate of Service dated 06/15/2015 by ECF. (SEB) |
COMPLIANCE RECEIVED. Addendum to reply brief received from Petitioner Si Min Cen. (MS) |
ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC REPLY BRIEF on behalf of Petitioner Si Min Cen, filed. Certificate of Service dated 06/12/2015 by US mail, ECF. (SEB) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER (Clerk) granting Motion for extension of time filed by Petitioner Si Min Cen. Petitioner's reply brief must be filed and served on or before June 12, 2015, filed. (MB) |
ECF FILER: UNOPPOSED Motion filed by Petitioner Si Min Cen for leave to file a Reply to Respondent's Brief. Certificate of Service dated 05/28/2015. (SEB) |
ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC ADDENDUM to BRIEF on behalf of Respondent Attorney General United States of America , filed. Certificate of Service dated 05/22/2015 by ECF. (JRM) |
COMPLIANCE RECEIVED. Electronic Addendum to Brief received from Respondent Attorney General United States of America. (MCW) |
ORDER (Clerk) granting Motion by Respondent for leave to file brief out of time with filing as of May 18, 2015. Petitioner's brief must be filed and served within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, filed. (MCW) |
HARD COPY RECEIVED from Respondent Attorney General United States of America - Brief. Copies: 7. Received: 10. (RM) |
NON COMPLIANCE Order issued to Respondent Attorney General United States of America regarding the brief filed on 05/18/2015. Please open the attachment for the full text of the Order. Compliance due by 05/22/2015. This Order does not change the deadline for filing the next brief. (MCW) |
ECF FILER: UNOPPOSED Motion filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America to file brief out of time, filed. Certificate of Service dated 05/19/2015 by ECF. [Attachment removed/duplicate of motion filed on 5/18/15][Changed event and docket text]--[Edited 05/22/2015 by MCW] (JRM) |
ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC BRIEF on behalf of Respondent Attorney General United States of America, filed. Certificate of Service dated 05/18/2015 by ECF. (JRM) |
ECF FILER: UNOPPOSED Motion filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America to file brief for respondent out of time. Certificate of Service dated 05/18/2015. (JRM) |
Clerk's letter to counsel for respondent requesting response within 10 days on the intention of participation in this appeal. (TMM) |
HARD COPY RECEIVED from Petitioner Si Min Cen - Brief with Volume I of Appendix attached. Copies: 7. (RM) |
HARD COPY RECEIVED from Petitioner Si Min Cen - Addendum to Brief. Copies: 7. (RM) |
HARD COPY RECEIVED from Petitioner Si Min Cen - Appendix. Copies: 4. Volumes: 2 (Volume I attached to Brief). (MS) |
ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC ADDENDUM to BRIEF on behalf of Petitioner Si Min Cen containing Certificate of Virus Detection, filed. Certificate of Service dated 03/26/2015 by ECF. (SEB) |
NON COMPLIANCE Order issued to Petitioner Si Min Cen regarding the brief filed on 03/25/2015. Please open the attachment for the full text of the Order. Compliance due by 03/30/2015. This Order does not change the deadline for filing the next brief. (MCW) |
COMPLIANCE RECEIVED. Electronic Addendum to Brief received from Petitioner Si Min Cen. (MCW) |
ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC BRIEF with Volume I of Appendix attached on behalf of Petitioner Si Min Cen, filed. Certificate of Service dated 03/25/2015 by ECF. (SEB) |
ECF FILER: ELECTRONIC APPENDIX on behalf of Petitioner Si Min Cen, filed. Certificate of service dated 03/25/2015 by ECF. (SEB) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER (Clerk) granting Motion for extension of time filed by Petitioner Si Min Cen. Petitioner's brief and appendix must be filed and served on or before March 25, 2015, filed. (MB) |
ECF FILER: UNOPPOSED Motion filed by Petitioner Si Min Cen for Extension of Time to file Petitioner's Brief until/for 30 Days. Certificate of Service dated 02/17/2015. (SEB) |
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD, filed. (TMM) |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Petitioner Si Min Cen due on or before 02/23/2015. Appendix due on or before 02/23/2015. (TMM) |
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD, received. (GA) |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jeffrey R. Meyer on behalf of Respondent(s) United States Attorney General. (JRM) |
ECF FILER: AGENCY INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Si Min Cen, filed. (SEB) |
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record. (TMM) |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Scott E. Bratton, Esq. for Petitioner Si Min Cen. (TMM) |
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Si Min Cen, filed. (TMM) |
AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Si Min Cen. Service made on 12/26/2014. USCA Receipt No. 14823. Receipt date 12/29/2014. (TMM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.