Hugo Ramos v. Attorney General United State
| HUGO MIGUEL DUARTE RAMOS |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 16-2002 |
| April 22, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Hugo Ramos v. Attorney General United States |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3012571697
NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: HARDIMAN, SCIRICA and ROSENTHAL*, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 11. Judge: SCIRICA Authoring. *The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Hugo Ramos v. Attorney General United State | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: HUGO MIGUEL DUARTE RAMOS | |
| Represented By: | Roger R. Laguna |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Thomas W. Hussey |
| Represented By: | Loretta Lynch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
