Qiao Fang Ke v. Attorney General United State
QIAO FANG KE |
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
17-1693 |
March 29, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Qiao Fang Ke v. Attorney General United States |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3012761284 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: AMBRO, KRAUSE, Circuit Judges and *CONTI, Chief District Judge. Total Pages: 7. Judge: Chief District Judge CONTI Authoring. *Honorable Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti, District Court Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Qiao Fang Ke v. Attorney General United State | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: QIAO FANG KE | |
Represented By: | Richard Tarzia |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Thomas W. Hussey |
Represented By: | Jeff Sessions |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.