Johan Tineo Moya v. Attorney General United States
JOHAN ANTONIO TINEO MOYA, AKA Johan Moya |
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-1023 |
January 2, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER (MCKEE and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges) granting Petitioner's Motion to stay of removal. As the Court's determination in the pending matter of Rosa v. Attorney General U.S., No 18-1765, may affect our determination here, this case is stayed pending the disposition of the appeal at No. 18-1765, filed. Panel No.: ALD-097. McKee, Authoring Judge. (KR) [Entered: 02/25/2019 01:30 PM] |
AGENCY DOCKETING STATEMENT on behalf of Petitioner Johan Antonio Tineo Moya, received. (TMM) [Entered: 02/19/2019 03:41 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Petitioner Johan Antonio Tineo Moya due on or before 04/01/2019. Appendix due on or before 04/01/2019. (TMM) [Entered: 02/19/2019 03:44 PM] |
ECF FILER: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD, filed. [19-1023] (TS) [Entered: 02/01/2019 01:28 PM] |
FOLLOW UP LETTER to Robert J. Pures, II, Esq. for Johan Antonio Tineo Moya requesting the following document(s): Agency Docketing Statement on or before 02/01/2019. (KR) [Entered: 01/18/2019 02:17 PM] |
ECF FILER: Response filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America to Motion to stay removal. Certificate of Service dated 01/11/2019. [19-1023] (JDL) [Entered: 01/11/2019 10:47 AM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jesse D. Lorenz on behalf of Respondent(s) Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General. [19-1023] (JDL) [Entered: 01/03/2019 09:42 AM] |
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record. (KR) [Entered: 01/02/2019 04:49 PM] |
MOTION filed by Petitioner Johan Antonio Tineo Moya to Stay Removal. Response due on 01/14/2019. Certificate of Service dated 01/02/2019. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 01/02/2019 04:51 PM] |
ORDER (Clerk) temporarily granting motion for stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal, filed. (KR) [Entered: 01/02/2019 04:52 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE filed by Attorney Robert J. Pures, II, Esq. for Petitioner Johan Antonio Tineo Moya.. (KR) [Entered: 01/03/2019 11:49 AM] |
AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Johan Antonio Tineo Moya. Certificate of Service dated 01/02/2019. Service made by ECF. USCA Receipt No. 3CA005128. Receipt date 01/02/2019. (KR) [Entered: 01/02/2019 04:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Johan Tineo Moya v. Attorney General United States | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: JOHAN ANTONIO TINEO MOYA, AKA Johan Moya | |
Represented By: | Robert J. Pures Esq. II |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Jesse D. Lorenz Esq. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.