Christopher Rad v. Attorney General United States
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER RAD
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 19-1404
Filed: February 19, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 21, 2020 Summary Rad v. Attorney General United States

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2019 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America for Extension of Time to file Respondent's Answering Brief until/for 24 days or 05/16/2019. Certificate of Service dated 04/18/2019. Service made by ECF, US mail. [19-1404] (JAB) [Entered: 04/18/2019 01:50 PM]
March 21, 2019 PRO SE BRIEF on behalf of Petitioner Christopher Rad, filed. Pages: 26. Certificate of Service dated 03/22/2019 by ECF through Clerk's Office. (SJB) [Entered: 03/22/2019 11:07 AM]
March 11, 2019 Reply filed by Petitioner Christopher Rad to Respondent's Response to Motion to Stay Removal, filed. (CJG) [Entered: 03/12/2019 07:56 AM]
March 7, 2019 ECF FILER: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD, filed. [19-1404] (TS) [Entered: 03/07/2019 02:24 PM]
March 7, 2019 BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Petitioner Christopher Rad due on or before 04/16/2019. Appendix due on or before 04/16/2019. (CJG) [Entered: 03/07/2019 03:03 PM]
March 7, 2019 CLERK ORDER granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Christopher Rad, filed. (CJG) [Entered: 03/07/2019 12:58 PM]
February 28, 2019 ECF FILER: Response filed by Respondent Attorney General United States of America to motion to stay removal. Certificate of Service dated 02/28/2019. [19-1404] (JAB) [Entered: 02/28/2019 06:30 PM]
February 27, 2019 MOTION filed by Petitioner Christopher Rad to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed. (CJG) [Entered: 02/28/2019 08:42 AM]
February 21, 2019 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jacob Bashyrov on behalf of Respondent(s) William P. Barr. [19-1404] (JAB) [Entered: 02/21/2019 03:34 PM]
February 19, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record. (CJG) [Entered: 02/19/2019 04:49 PM]
February 19, 2019 MOTION filed by Petitioner Christopher Rad to Stay Removal. Response due on 03/01/2019. (CJG) [Entered: 02/19/2019 04:52 PM]
February 19, 2019 Opinion or Order ORDER (Clerk) temporarily granting motion for stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal, filed. (PDB) [Entered: 02/19/2019 05:41 PM]
February 19, 2019 AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Christopher Rad. Certificate of Service dated 02/19/2019. Service made by ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 02/19/2019 04:48 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Christopher Rad v. Attorney General United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER RAD
Represented By: Christopher Rad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Jacob A. Bashyrov Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?