Terrence Lewis v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
| TERRENCE LEWIS |
| SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA |
| 19-1802 |
| April 12, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RECORD received. One folder. (SJB) [Entered: 05/14/2019 11:55 AM] |
| RECORD RETURNED. One folder. (SJB) [Entered: 05/14/2019 12:00 PM] |
| LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (MW) [Entered: 05/06/2019 12:17 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Terrence Lewis, filed. (ARR) [Entered: 05/03/2019 05:20 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Terrence Lewis to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 05/06/2019. Certificate of Service dated 04/22/2019. Service made by US mail. (MB) [Entered: 04/26/2019 04:02 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Max C. Kaufman on behalf of Appellee(s) Supt. Camp Hill SCI; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. [19-1802] (MCK) [Entered: 04/15/2019 11:21 AM] |
| PARTIAL RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF.--[Edited 04/16/2019 by ARR] (ARR) [Entered: 04/12/2019 10:57 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Terrence Lewis for Certificate of Appealability. Certificate of Service dated 04/12/2019. Service made by US mail. (ARR) [Entered: 04/12/2019 11:03 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Terrence Lewis in District Court No. 2-17-cv-02448. (ARR) [Entered: 04/12/2019 10:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
