James Anderson v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
| JAMES R. ANDERSON |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI |
| 19-2237 |
| June 3, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Max C. Kaufman on behalf of Appellee(s) Supt. Phoenix SCI; District Attorney Philadelphia; Attorney General Pennsylvania. [19-2237] (MCK) [Entered: 06/05/2019 08:32 AM] |
| LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for a decision on the issuance of certificate of appealability. (NF) [Entered: 06/04/2019 05:52 PM] |
| EXHIBITS A-H in Support of Appeal. Certificate of Service dated 05/21/2019. Service made by US mail. (DW) [Entered: 06/03/2019 11:10 AM] |
ORDER (Clerk) It is noted that Graterford ceased operations on July 15, 2018. Accordingly, the superintendent of Petitioner's new facility, Phoenix SCI, has been substituted into the case and caption as the appellee. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434-35 (2004). It is noted that the superintendent has been added by title, not name. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). Any objections to this order must be filed and served within seven (7) days of the date of this order., filed. (DW) [Entered: 06/03/2019 10:47 AM]
|
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (DW) [Entered: 06/03/2019 10:39 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant James R. Anderson in District Court No. 2-07-cv-00795. (DW) [Entered: 06/03/2019 10:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
