Peter DiPietro v. Warden Burlington County Deten, et al
| PETER DIPIETRO |
| WARDEN CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and WARDEN SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY |
| NOEL L. HILLMAN |
| 19-2652 |
| July 22, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION filed by Petitioner Peter DiPietro to Proceed In Forma Pauperis.--[Edited 07/22/2019 by TMM] (TMM) [Entered: 07/22/2019 09:26 AM] |
| NONCOMPLIANCE Order Action on the petition for writ of mandamus and motion to proceed in forma pauperis is deferred. Petitioner did not serve the petition on each party to the proceeding in the trial court (or on counsel for each party) or provide a copt of the petition for writ of mandamus to the District Court judge. In addition, a copy of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis must be served on each party to the proceeding, including the District Court judge. A certificate of service reflecting that the petition and motion have been served must be submitted to the Court of Appeals within 14 days of the date of this order. If proof of service is not filed with the Court, the petition may be dismissed without further notice. In addition, the petition will not be submitted to the Court until proof of service is received, filed. Compliance due 08/05/2019. (TMM) [Entered: 07/22/2019 09:23 AM] |
| PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Peter DiPietro. (TMM) [Entered: 07/22/2019 09:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
