Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sajid Raza v. Warden Camden County Correctional Facility
as 22-3071
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAJID RAZA
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Michael McAdams v. Warden Camden County Corr, et al
as 19-3790
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES MCADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY and WARDEN CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
In re: Peter DiPietro
as 19-3039
Respondent:
WARDEN CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and WARDEN SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Not Yet Classified:
NOEL L. HILLMAN
Petitioner:
In re: PETER DIPIETRO
Peter DiPietro v. Warden Burlington County Deten, et al
as 19-2652
Respondent:
WARDEN CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and WARDEN SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
PETER DIPIETRO
Not Yet Classified:
NOEL L. HILLMAN
Michael Clevenger v. Warden Camden County Correctio
as 19-2550
Respondent:
WARDEN CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JOSEPH CLEVENGER
Nicole Toland v. Warden Camden County, et al
as 19-2134
Petitioner:
NICOLE TOLAND, in behalf of Peter DePietro
Respondent:
WARDEN CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and WARDEN SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Peter DiPietro v. Warden Burlington County, et al
as 19-2107
Respondent:
WARDEN CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and WARDEN SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
PETER DIPIETRO
DAVIS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2019cv09083
Respondent:
WARDEN CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Reginal Davis v. Warden Camden County Correcti
as 19-1645
Respondent:
WARDEN CAMDDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and WARDEN CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
REGINAL LEE DAVIS and REGINAL LEE DAVIS, AKA Reginald L. Davis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
